Jump to content

User talk:Sahaib

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Sahaib3005)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by A1Cafel in topic File:Bear on hammock.jpg
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sahaib!


-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Laurence McKenna in 2019 (cropped).jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Laurence McKenna in 2019 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, TansoShoshen (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

In regards to your AI-generated response on my user page, you uploaded the files after the CC-license was removed not before. If you did before, then the files would be under that CC-license. TansoShoshen (talk) 08:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@TansoShoshen: I figured that out myself which is why I had already removed the message from your talk page. I have uploaded better images anyway in Category:Laurence McKenna in 2021. Sahaib (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@TansoShoshen The license is not revocable any way Commons:License revocation "Once a work is published under a CC license, licensees may continue using the work according to the license terms for the duration of copyright protection." why would it matter that it is removed  REAL 💬   18:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
To my understanding, that is the case if a derivative file (aka a licensee) was uploaded during when the CC license was applied. Once removed from the original source, those derivative files are still valid under that CC license, hence not being able to be revoked.
The problem here is that these files were uploaded after the fact the CC license was revoked from the original video. In that case no new files should be produced. TansoShoshen (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Why no new files should be produced? Being able to create derivative works (And publish under the same license) is a term of the license and can't be revoked  REAL 💬   19:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cosplay_of_characters_by_year

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Category:Cosplay_of_characters_by_year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Trade (talk) 23:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your use of no-permission templates

[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you're adding {{No permission}} templates to files where the summary says that it's the uploader's own work. What's your thinking there? Belbury (talk) 07:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Belbury: I which there was a way to find out how many files have been deleted after I have added the template. Because a much greater percentage of the files have been deleted than have been disputed which would show that I am actually really good at identifying files that seem "dodgy" based on a number of things e.g. Metadata, or number of uploads, or the quality of the image, or the subject of the image (it is quite common for someone to upload images that aren't their own, just to put it in a wikipedia article), or the author of the image (sometimes the uploader claims to be the person in the photo and the photographer which wouldn't make sense unless it was a selfie), etc. Sahaib (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Reflection In Rob's Sunglasses.jpg

[edit]
File:Reflection In Rob's Sunglasses.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Syrus257 (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Teletubbies cake.jpg

[edit]
File:Teletubbies cake.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Birds_by_year

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Birds by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Lukas Beck (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ram's_head

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Ram's head has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jmabel ! talk 02:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Peter Griffin Knitwit (3634634981).jpg

[edit]
File:Peter Griffin Knitwit (3634634981).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Bill Tom.jpg

[edit]
File:Bill Tom.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

* Pppery * it has begun... 23:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Today is my 6 year wedding anniversary!.jpg

[edit]
File:Today is my 6 year wedding anniversary!.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nv8200pa (talk) 13:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Bear on hammock.jpg

[edit]
File:Bear on hammock.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply