Jump to content

User talk:JWilz12345

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 3 days ago by JWilz12345 in topic Some questions
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JWilz12345!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:43, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Userboxes
UTC+8This user's timezone is UTC+8.
This user respects copyright, but sometimes it can be a major pain.


Concern about logo copyrights in the Philippines

[edit]

I was corresponding with the Copyright Division of the NLP regarding the 1998 Philippine Centennial logo. According to the staff member that emailed me back, "A logo is not included among the copyrightable works under R.A. 8293." I'm not sure how to interpret this, so I'm asking for your thoughts. --Aristorkle (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Aristorkle kindly reply back about what kind of work the logo (logos in general) is under the copyright law. Kindly clarify again, considering some relatively simple logos have been granted copyright protection by the IPOPHL as per examples shown at COM:Philippines#Threshold of originality (most notably Photo Sikwate logo). Note that the National Library and the IPOPHL may have differing views.
Pinging some interested parties here (both from here and abroad, whom I have interacted in multiple occasions concerning copyright-related things): @Chlod, Ralffralff, Seav, Clindberg, Tvpuppy, Yann, Abzeronow, and Rosenzweig: . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@JWilz12345 NLP is not being clear with me, honestly. They say that logos can be copyrighted if they are considered "drawings" but not when they are considered "logos". --Aristorkle (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Aristorkle perhaps we can argue that Photo Sikwate logo resembles a drawing. But this logo clearly isn't a drawing, yet IPOPHL copyright registry listed "Christian Society for the Deaf (CSD) Logo" as among the registered logos (G-2019-00101; January 29, 2019; holder: Iglesia ni Cristo).
Perhaps it's best to inquire NLP about a list of all logos with registrations, irrespective of being drawings or not. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to discussion about FoP In Bangladesh

[edit]

Dear @JWilz12345: ,
I hope you are well. While addressing some recent copyright questions, I read the entire Copyright Act, 2023 of Bangladesh. During this review, I noticed that COM:FOP Bangladesh was removed following the discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/09#Bangladesh without full analysis of the law. After conducting a detailed review of the full statute, I have become reasonably confident that architectural works are not protected by copyright in Bangladesh under the current act. Based on this interpretation, images of architecture and sculptures that are not created by carving or molding should be eligible for upload as free works on Commons.

I have outlined the relevant legal reasoning and citations in a discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#FoP in Bangladesh. I realize the post is quite long, but I attempted to address the issue as comprehensively as possible.

I would greatly appreciate your thoughts and feedback there.Tausheef Hassan Auntu ✉Talk? 19:20, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/doc

[edit]
Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/doc has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/layout

[edit]
Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/layout has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/lang

[edit]
Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/lang has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/en

[edit]
Template:NoFoP-Mongolia/en has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Some questions

[edit]

Dear @JWilz12345: ,

I hope you are doing well. I have a few questions regarding licenses and copyright. If you are open to answering them, I will ask them below. Thanks! Tausheef Hassan Auntu ✉Talk? 06:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Tausheef Hassan kindly discuss those at COM:VPC, preferably as a new subsection under the section you created. Do not split discussions (as in fragmentation). Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@JWilz12345: I’m looking for some personal opinions on a few things unrelated to FoP. I’d like to get some feedback before initiating formal discussions. Since I also have another huge proposal active at bn.Wikisource, I don’t want to overwhelm myself or others. My questions relate mainly to what Commons accepts as authentic text, OGL Bangladesh, and reviewing a few of my license changes. Tausheef Hassan Auntu ✉Talk? 10:03, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Tausheef Hassan kindly open another topic at COM:VPC. I can't help at the moment. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply